2015 Summer Internship Opportunities

Internship Candidates

Do you want to intern at a world-famous publishing venture? A place where your day-to-day responsibilities may be limited to opening mail, grabbing coffee, and maybe some time on Twitter, but where everyone you know wants to get published?

If so, then this is not the internship for you.

If, on the other hand, you want to be an empowered member of a small team, with real responsibility for budgeting, marketing, growing a business—and most importantly, producing and selling books—this might be what you’re looking for.

What’s more, there might be money in it for you. (Not a lot of money, because we’re not a big company yet—but money directly tied to your effectiveness and results.)

We’re looking for one or more summer interns to help with the following tasks:

Marketing

-          Expand distribution of existing titles.

-          Develop a budgeted marketing plan to boost sales of existing titles through online advertising, reading groups, social media, and other methods as you see fit.

-          Execute the marketing plan.

-          Track the results of marketing, paying particular attention to the cost-effectiveness and time-effectiveness of various methods.

-          Tweet, but only as an absolute last resort.

-          Receive a cut of any increased revenue during the term of the internship.

Acquisitions

-          Solicit new manuscripts in a variety of forms. (Novels, short story collections, novellas, poetry collections, short stories, long stories. We’ll consider most things, as long as they’re worthy of the Tortoise brand. And as long as they’re written—no albums, movies, or interpretive dance routines.)

-          Help determine which works to publish.

-          Receive a cut of any project you bring to Tortoise Books.

Business Development

-          Research and apply for publishing grants.

-          Investigate additional opportunities to grow the business.

Applicants must be in Chicago or its environs during the summer. Hours will be very flexible—we’re more focused on results than on time spent working. In fact, successful applicants are more than welcome to work elsewhere as well during the internship, but we will conduct weekly face-to-face meetings to review progress and plans.

If some (or all) of this interests you, please submit a brief cover letter using our submission form. (It’s on the bottom of the “WHY TORTOISE BOOKS” page.) Please touch on the following topics:

-          Introduction

-          What you’re reading now, and why

-          What books you love, and why

-          What’s overrated, and why

-          Your short-term goals in writing and/or publishing

-          Your long-term goals

Submissions will be open until April 25th. Solid prospects will be asked to email a resume and references. Interviews will be conducted by phone and/or in person until April 30th, with results announced May 1, and negotiation of final terms and timeframes shortly thereafter.

LAUNCH PARTY ANNOUNCEMENT - THE DARK WILL END THE DARK

Hello, all:

We're having a book launch next month here in Chicago, and you're all invited! (Or rather, as many of you as the fire marshall will allow in the bookstore.) Details below:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Launch Party for The Dark Will End The Dark by Darrin Doyle

Tortoise Books is thrilled to announce the Chicago launch party for our newest project, Darrin Doyle’s The Dark Will End The Dark. We will be celebrating with a series of readings on Friday, March 13th at Powell’s Bookstore at UIC, 1218 S. Halsted, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. In addition to the featured author, we’ll be featuring a variety of local writers, including:

 -          Ben Tanzer, director of publicity for Curbside Splendor and author of My Father’s House, Orphans, and Lost in Space.

-          Joseph G. Peterson, author of Wanted: Elevator Man and Gideon’s Confession.

-          Rachel Slotnick, RHINO prize winner and Pushcart-nominated author of the forthcoming In Lieu of Flowers.

-          Giano Cromley, finalist for the High Plains Book Awards and author of The Last Good Halloween.

This is the first author we’ve recruited from outside Chicago, and the first one who’s already been traditionally published. It’s an important step in our slow and steady strategy to provide a viable and vibrant alternative to both the strictures of traditional publishing and the low-quality free-wheeling anarchy of the self-publishing marketplace—but more importantly, it’s a great chance to showcase an electrifying collection of stories from a tremendously talented writer. 

About the Book

Stunning and visceral in its emotional impact, The Dark Will End The Dark collects 14 stories by veteran author Darrin Doyle. Deftly mixing realism and fabulism, bleakness and hope, sparkling dialogue and unforgettable characters, these literary Midwestern Gothic tales remain in the reader’s mind long after the last page is turned.

"The human body, logic, and language are all rent apart and remade dazzlingly anew in these fourteen stories. With the droll fabulism of Nikolai Gogol and the moral heft of Shirley Jackson, Doyle’s characters face problems both surreal and all-too-real...Fantastical yet close to the bone, these stories are both wounding and wondrous."

- Monica McFawn, author of Bright Shards of Someplace Else, winner of the Flannery O’ Connor Award

 

"Doyle's stories are lamentations, demented fairy tales, and quests for enlightenment in which the author explores bodily dysfunction and ungainly lust while familial love hums in the background. In the manner of George Saunders, Doyle uses his smart, light language to lift readers above the darkness of shame and humiliation that brings so many of his characters to their knees."

- Bonnie Jo Campbell, author of Once Upon a River and American Salvage, finalist for the National Book Award

 

"Darrin Doyle’s a mad scientist who has stitched together a hauntingly beautiful collection from tattered body parts and a strange, ragged heart. It is only after you’ve been defibrillated by the stories in The Dark Will End the Dark that you realize you’ve been dozing through the days. Doyle’s got his fingers on the pulse of our brave new American psyche and his writing blazes electric."

- Jason Ockert, author of Wasp Box and Neighbors of Nothing

About the Author

Darrin Doyle has lived in Saginaw, Kalamazoo, Grand Rapids, Cincinnati, Louisville, Osaka (Japan), and Manhattan (Kansas). He has worked as a paperboy, mover, janitor, telemarketer, pizza delivery driver, door-to-door salesman, copy consultant, porn store clerk, freelance writer, and technical writer, among other jobs. After graduating from Western Michigan University with an MFA in fiction, he taught English in Japan for a year. He then realized he wanted to pursue fiction writing and permanently stop doing jobs he didn’t love, so he earned his PhD from the University of Cincinnati.

 He is the author of the novels Revenge of the Teacher’s Pet: A Love Story (LSU Press) and The Girl Who Ate Kalamazoo (St. Martin’s), and the short story collection The Dark Will End the Dark (Tortoise Books). His short stories have appeared in Alaska Quarterly Review, Blackbird, Harpur Palate, Redivider, BULL, and Puerto del Sol, among others.

Currently he teaches at Central Michigan University and lives in Mount Pleasant, Michigan with his wife and two sons. His website is www.darrindoyle.com.

Hercules or Sisyphus: Publishing’s False Dichotomy

As usual, I’ve been meaning to update the Tortoise Books blog. But I believe promotional writing should always take a backseat to paid writing, so I try to focus on work I’m planning to sell, be it mine or yours. Another of my maxims: When you don’t have anything new—or at least new-ish—to say, don’t publish. (That’s not to say you should stop writing, because sometimes it isn’t until after you sit down that you realize that you actually do have something to say—you can write a shitty first draft, make some revisions, and eventually publish something that makes you proud. Shout out to Anne Lamott for that wisdom.) My thinking runs contrary to popular blog wisdom, which dictates that you should keep posting at all times, at all costs. But I don’t want to waste anyone’s time; I haven’t had much new to say, until today.

I’ve been investigating various publishing opportunities, both for Tortoise Books and myself; as part of this, I recently emailed the hard-working people at Oyster, who are busy trying to do something new in publishing: to sell it as a subscription-based streaming service, a Netflix for books. I wanted to sound a little highfalutin’, and I was busy trying to decide whether Hercules or Sisyphus was most metaphorically similar to the post-postmodern author, when it occurred to me that both are apt, and flawed.

I’ve read many publishing blog discussions implying that today’s author must either go the traditional route—writer lands an agent, agent lands a publisher, publisher lands writer fame and fortune—or go their own way, self-publishing via eBook and publish-on-demand, trying to build their own brand but still toiling away in obscurity, indistinguishable (at least in the eyes of the public-at-large) from the typo-ridden tomes hastily put out by all those mediocre keyboard monkeys eager to check “Write a Book” off their bucket lists. Some discussions do at least suggest that an author might want to go both routes, publishing some projects traditionally and some on their own. But nobody admits it’s a false dichotomy.

Granted, getting published via traditional means can feel like the labors of Hercules. If you don’t recall the specifics, I’ll spare you the Wikipedia refresher: Hercules was given ten tasks thought to be well-nigh impossible. (Slaying the Hydra, seizing the Erymanthian Boar, cleaning the Augean stables in a day, etc.) And because of issues with two tasks, he was given two more, bringing the total number to twelve. (Source: Wikipedia.) Surely anyone who’s prevailed in traditional publishing (which I haven’t) or even attempted it (which I have) can relate to the moving finish line, and the difficulty of, say, getting published in a respectable source, or getting an agent to read and respond to a query letter, let alone landing a major deal. But there is at least a logical progression of events, with a beginning and an end. And just as Hercules wanted immortality for his efforts, many who go the traditional route seem hell-bent on various analogous publishing accomplishments: the Pulitzer Prize, the New York Times bestseller list, the major-newspaper review, or even the Barnes and Noble bookshelf.

For those who are (depending on your perspective) too untalented, too unlucky, or just too inept at publishing politics to accomplish any of the above, there is at least an alternative: self-publishing. And as one who’s labored in this field (and seen others do the same), I can verify that it seems like a Sisyphean ordeal. Much as Sisyphus was forced to endlessly roll a boulder up the side of a hill, only to watch it roll down the other side, the self-published author’s labors are eminently accomplishable, and endlessly repetitive: tweeting and retweeting, writing and rewriting, publishing and republishing. These are not Herculean feats, for there’s no glory to be had, and no end in sight. (Camus’ excellent The Myth of Sisyphus romanticizes the eternal struggle, suggesting that one can find meaning and identity even in perpetual futile efforts. But the origin myth itself isn’t quite so noble: Sisyphus was being punished, after all, for his deceitfulness—a trait not uncommon among self-published authors, with their parades of five-star sock puppet reviews, and their suspicious five-figure Twitter followerships. [Yes, that’s right. I’m calling you out, self-published author tweeps. If your FOLLOWING and FOLLOWERS numbers both end in a K, and I’ve never heard of you, I don’t believe you. I won’t publicly call bullshit on you and your robot army, but I don’t really have to. You know who you are.])

Fortunately it doesn’t have to be this way, on either end. Smaller and smarter publishers like yours truly (and others, though I won’t name names) are using publish-on-demand for many titles, and figuring out other inexpensive strategies to circumvent the traditional model. Plenty of challenges remain: discoverability, physical distribution to independent bookstores, figuring out exactly what percentage of the eggs to put in Amazon’s (admittedly large and comfy) basket. And it isn’t ideal, but it’s ideal for anyone who doesn’t feel it should be deal-or-ordeal. Instead of exhausting himself, Hercules can go to the gym every day, get pretty buff, and save some energy for tasks of his own choosing; Sisyphus can repent for his deceit, round up some friends, roll the rock to a higher hill, and get some help to make sure it stays there.

Occasional Poetry

Some time ago, I stumbled into a Wikipedia wormhole that led me to the story of David Shaw and his fatal cave dive in Bushman's Hole, South Africa. It was one of those haunting stories that left me possessed; over the next few days, I read everything I could about it, particularly this excellent piece from Outside Magazine. But I still couldn't stop thinking about it, so I wrote a poem.

This poem hasn't yet fit in any of my collections, although I am thinking of starting a new collection inspired by random shit I find on Wikipedia. In the meantime, I liked it and wanted to post it somewhere on the interwebs, so you're welcome to read it here.

Side Projects

The Next Best Book Blog recently featured me in their "Where Writer's Write" series; my piece (about the trials and tribulations of the train-bound author) is up here. 

This gets at one of the unfortunate realities of Tortoise Books--it is, for now, a side project. Still, I'm hoping to grow it into something larger, and I'm working and planning along those lines. And even side projects can be expertly executed. I'd write an awesome list of the key things to keep in mind when you're trying to have an excellent side project, but my friend Scott Smith (a.k.a. "Our Man in Chicago") beat me to it.

And in the hopes of turning this into something more than a side project, we're applying for a grant. I'll admit, it does feel kinda uncool to be asking for money. But to quote the immortal Lone Star from the epic Spaceballs, "We're not just doing this for money...we're doing it for a SHITLOAD of money." So if you'd like to help us out, you can vote very easily here.

Many thanks...onward!

Things We Should Have Reviewed Long Ago, Vol. I: Disraeli Gears

So we're hearing that one should post new blog content every week, which is tough, because there's also writing and editing work to do, and that must come first. (It's also tough because tortoise.) But in an effort to stay relatively active with the new content, while also staying true to our tortoise selves, we're starting a new semi-regular series: Things We Should Have Reviewed Long Ago.

First up: Cream's Disraeli Gears.

An Open Letter to Michael Pietsch on Amazon v. Hachette

Dear Mr. Pietsch:

As an Amazon KDP author and fledgling publisher, I recently received an email suggesting I send you my thoughts on the Amazon/Hachette dispute. It took me a while to get around to it, because tortoise. And I didn't want to spam you, because that'd be rude, and politeness is in such short supply on the interwebs. So here goes:

Please, please, please keep doing exactly what you’re doing. (Please!)

As a reader, I would greatly prefer that eBooks be less expensive. While I value, to some extent, the traditional industry’s role curating titles and authors, I’m also tremendously reluctant to shell out ten dollars or more for an eBook, and price is a major concern in my reading decisions. (Case in point: I was going to purchase Don DeLillo’s White Noise recently, because I haven’t gotten around to reading it yet, but it was at the upper end of the price spectrum, whereas Underworld, which I read when it came out, was briefly on sale for only $3.99. So I reread that instead.) The longer I live, the longer my reading list gets, and since I know I’ll never get to the end of it, I’d just as soon make the journey as economically as possible.

Now that I’m dipping my tortoise toes in the waters of independent—or rather, Amazon-dependent—publishing, though, I realize it’s to my great advantage for you to stay obstinate on this issue. Frankly, the slower you are to change, the better it is for me, and the more time I have to build my company as a viable alternative.

I’ll skip all the normal metaphors about publishing, about castles and gatekeepers and blah blah blah. From my experience, all of these are true to some extent, but they’ve grown a bit shopworn. And I prefer to think in terms of ecosystems.

We’ll call the traditional industry Normal Sea. And I’ve started thinking of this vast new body of publishing waters as the Indie-an Ocean. Where these bodies meet, one finds snark-infested waters—and for good reason. The latter’s a little chaotic, and frankly there are a lot of awful creations therein, ungodly abominations destined to sink without a trace. Whereas the former’s a little too obsessed with purity and homogeneity, despite its protestations to the contrary. Traditionally published books may be edgy, but they’re often edgy in similar ways, depending on the tastes of the particular moment.

As others far more astute than I have observed, two main streams feed the Normal Sea: NYC and MFA. And however one gets to the end of those streams, one must then (according to tradition) pass through a series of gratings to gain entrance to those hallowed waters. And any life form that doesn’t fit those narrowly defined openings gets shunted aside and discarded. (Case in point: the first outside novel I picked up, Giano Cromley’s excellent The Last Good Halloween. The main characters are teenagers, but it’s too good, too literary, and too mature to be lumped into a genre like “Young Adult.” And Giano had been working with agents, but none of them quite knew what to do with it. So I read it, and I found myself laughing out loud and enjoying the hell out of it, and I decided to help him get it out there. And I crowdsourced my second round of edits, and most of my readers told me they were laughing out loud, too—except for one or two, who might have been somewhat cranky because they're trying to squeeze through the gratings in the MFA stream. One of them said, “I don’t know how to read this. Is it YA, or what?” And I wanted to scream: “Who cares? Who the fuck cares, really? Did you read it? Do you like it? Do you think other people should read it?” That’s all that matters, really. If it’s good, it’ll sell eventually.)

As far as the Indie-an Ocean goes, it’s fed by a greater range of streams and rivers, and, of course, Amazon. (I know my metaphor is falling apart here and contravening basic geography, but bear with me for a minute.) Amazon is muddy and far too big to filter, except by cutting off bits at the source. And, of course, the Normal Sea also feeds it. (OK, my metaphor is definitely falling apart. I have no idea whether any of this is hydrologically possible. But you get my drift.) You, of course, have long had a preferred relationship as a source. Now, of course, that relationship’s under review, and I don't blame you or your authors for the positions you're taking; I'd probably do something similar if I were you. But I suspect the river hasn’t gotten noticeably smaller, and I doubt anything you do will change that. The balance of components in the ecosystem may change a bit, that’s all. And some of the readers fishing for their next meal may complain, but I suspect they won’t stay too hungry for too long. Advantage: tortoise. (I think. Wait, do I want to be eaten? Yes, as long as it’s by an actual person with good taste.)

Different people have different tastes, and obviously not everything in the sea matches everyone’s palate. (Oh wait. Crap. Crap, crap, crap, crap! According to Wikipedia, tortoises are land-based, so this metaphorical world has completely fallen apart, and has actually become self-defeating. We're not swimming at all! Maybe we're on the Galapagos Islands or something. Then again, those are on the wrong side of South America. Fuck it, if I don't get this blog post up this week, it'll be completely irrelevant.) ANYWAY, I do believe that you get a greater range of tastes by getting things out there and letting them evolve than you get by trying to control the ecosystem. Plus, tastes are also evolving. Plenty of my friends still wax rhapsodic about the physical book, and I used to, too. Someone actually had to buy me a Kindle to get me on the whole eBook thing. But once I actually started reading eBooks, my taste started changing. And taste, to me, calls to mind another good way to look at the industry—less like what it has been, and more like food service, with low barriers to entry, and a great range of tastes, and places, still, for those who want exclusivity and trendiness, but plenty more options for good cheap eats.

Is Amazon's KDP program as good as it possibly could be? No, of course not, and I do have a couple things I'd change. But it’s pretty damn good, and it's improving all the time. Do I have all the resources I want, or all the resources you do? Again, no. (Given the business trinity, the three things you can't have at the same time--fast, good, and cheap--I'll always be picking the last two, at least until my bank balance is over four figures.) But unless the regular industry suddenly offers me a life-changing amount of money or publicity—which, let’s be honest, is probably not going to happen—I’ll keep rooting for Amazon, as a reader and a writer and a publisher. For unlike the regular industry, Amazon’s giving me SOMETHING—a chance to age and mature and have some fun and be part of the ecosystem, not apart from it. A chance to swim, or trundle, or whatever it is that tortoises do--grow old, perhaps, or win the race, or just find our place.

Best,

Gerald Brennan

Founder, Tortoise Books

My Writing Process Blog Tour

A Quick Note from Jerry:

I recently contracted the My Writing Process Blog Tour virus from Giano Cromley. A major symptom of this disease is an intense desire to tell everyone what I'm working on right now, as well an uncontrollable urge to infect others.

All kidding aside, I'm actually pretty thrilled to be participating--somehow when I actually to try to be part of something like this, it doesn't happen, so it's kinda cool that I was just selected without having to do anything. Also, I know there are some great authors in this thread, which makes me all the more excited to be a part of it. Without further ado, here goes:

1)     What am I working on?

I’m about halfway done with a novella called Public Loneliness. It’s a first-person account narrated by Yuri Gagarin that describes a hypothetical Soviet mission around the moon in October of 1967. He’s a fascinating character—he was one of the few Soviets to achieve rockstar-like popularity, not only at home, but in Western Europe and elsewhere. He was also a flawed and troubled man, far more real and interesting than the regime made him out to be.

The story highlights those contradictions, and the tension inherent in trying to control other people’s perceptions, both on an individual and a national level. It’s part of a series called Altered Space. I’m looking to tell several what-if stories from the golden age of space exploration. One’s out already—a novella called Zero Phase that posits an alternate timeline for the Apollo 13 mission—and I’d like to write two or three more.

2)     How does my work differ from others of its genre?

It’s historical fiction, but it’s also alternative history—and yet it’s more literary than most entries in those genres. (I hope!) A lot of authors write for purposes of ego gratification; they’re creating characters that are impossibly perfect, so as to live vicariously through them. It’s particularly prevalent in historical fiction; an author finds a historical figure with traits the author likes to think they also have, or one who’s done some big dramatic thing the author wishes they’d done. I’m more interested in really getting into someone else’s head, in seeing who they are and what makes them tick. Since I’m writing about real people, I do feel a natural obligation to be true and honest, but I’m more interested in bringing them back to life and fleshing them out than in building statues or monuments (in a literary sense) to honor their accomplishments. My guiding principle when writing fiction about non-fictional people is: “Respect, but not reverence.”

3)     Why do I write what I do?

Every time I sit down to write, it’s like a time travel vacation. And when I can come up with something realistic and entertaining, some line of dialogue that’s original but still rings true to what’s known about a character, I feel like I’ve accomplished something magical, and I feel great. And I want to share that. I think Bono from U2 once said something like: if this makes someone else feel even half as good as it makes me feel, I’ve got to keep doing it.

4)     How does your writing process work?

It’s a lot like my digestive process; I keep feeding stuff into one end until something starts coming out the other end. Or maybe that’s an unflattering analogy! I suppose I keep consuming until I’ve internalized whatever it is I’m consuming, until it gives me the energy to do something on my own. Right now I’m reading everything I can get my hands on about the Soviet space program; I’ve read two biographies of Gagarin, a biography of Sergei Korolev, part of Boris Chertok’s memoirs, and cosmonaut Alexei Leonov’s joint memoir with American astronaut Dave Scott. I’ve started on Asif Siddiqi’s massive two-volume history of the Soviet space program. I recently finished Boris Polevoi’s The Story of a Real Man (a piece of socialist realist propaganda that Gagarin claimed was his favorite book), and I’m probably going to re-read The Old Man and the Sea (which Alexei Leonov says was actually Gagarin’s favorite book). And somewhere in the midst of all that reading, I felt like I was starting to get to know Gagarin—as much as anyone can, for he was a man who was better than most at controlling what other people saw of him—and I started writing. There are still some unresolved contradictions, some points of contention among biographers and scholars and the public-at-large. And that’s dangerous in this type of writing—it’s tempting to look at someone like Gagarin and simply look for validation of one’s own political and religious views. But I’ve decided to embrace that and have some fun with it.

Next up will be three great authors I've encountered in my travels:

Jonathan Grant is the author of the novels Brambleman (winner of the IBPA's prestigious Benjamin Franklin Award) and Chain Gang Elementary. He is also the co-author and editor of the monumental history, The Way it Was in the South: The Black Experience in Georgia (UGA Press, 2001), named the state's nonfiction "Book of the Year" and Editor's Choice at AMERICAN HERITAGE magazine. His third novel, Party to a Crime, will be published by Thornbriar Press in 2014. He is currently at work on The Unhappy History of Higgston, Missouri, the sad tale of a drone strike on a small Midwestern town. He has also written a screenplay, A Thousand Miles to Freedom, based on the true story of Georgia's most famous escaped slaves, William and Ellen Craft. Grant grew up on a Missouri farm. came down South, and graduated from the University of Georgia. The former journalist, state government spokesman, PTA president, and soccer coach lives in Atlanta with his wife and two children. His entry will appear here.

Ilan Mochari's Pushcart-nominated debut novel, Zinsky the Obscure (Fomite Press, 2013), has earned rave reviews from Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, and Booklist. Boston's NPR station listed it as one of its ten "Good Reads for the Summer." The book was also featured in the Boston Globe's Word on the Street column. Ilan's short stories have appeared in KeyholeStymie, and Midway Journal. He is a Senior Writer for Inc magazine. In 1997, he earned a B.A. in English from Yale University. He used it to wait tables for nine years in the Boston area. His entry will appear on this blog.

Steve Karas lives in Chicago with his wife and daughter. His stories have appeared or are forthcoming in Friend.Follow.Text. #storiesFromLivingOnline (Enfield & Wizenty, 2013), Necessary FictionjmwwPrick of the Spindle, and elsewhere. He’s currently working on a collection of shorts. He'll be blogging here.

Tom Clancy's Dead, and I Don't Feel So Good Myself

So I meant to write something after Tom Clancy’s passing, and I’m only getting around to it now, because Tortoise.

In fairness to me, there have been more pressing matters: launching The Last Good Halloween, and wrapping up Zero Phase, and Tweeting and Tortoise business and family time and what-not. (My holy trinity of the writer’s life consists of three activities, all of which must be done almost every day: write, read, promote your writing. Roughly in that order. Not that I always do them in that order.)

But in all seriousness, I need to write something, because Tom Clancy’s one of those people for whom I have complicated feelings for which (as a better writer than I once observed) only Germans have words.

I first read The Hunt for Red October in paperback in the summer of 1988, between 5th and 6th grades. I was a precocious kid, bespectacled, street dumb but book smart, and relying on the latter for my sense of identity. I’d read a lot of demanding technical books, partly out of burning curiosity to understand, say, lasers or space shuttles, but also to amass knowledge, which I equated with facts, and which seemed to me to be the end-all, be-all of human existence. And I read to escape, which was both healthy and unhealthy. Needless to say, my social skills were somewhat lacking. But I became an autodidact who could impress other grade schoolers by giving them facts about koala bears for their papers, or a reasonably accurate (if undetailed) description of how nuclear bombs worked.

And The Hunt for Red October may have been the first adult novel that I read, the first book with plot arcs that had to be followed from page to page and remembered from day to day. I’d been reading kids’ books, fiction wise, 4B Goes Wild and things of that sort, with main characters that were in virtually every scene. And here was something hefty, with multiple plot strands, and action that moved from one place to the next. I had to at least dig in and remember, say, who Marko Ramius was, and why he killed his zampolit, and why Jack Ryan was meeting with all these people in Langley.

For the next few years, I devoured techno-thriller after techno-thriller—Harold Coyle, Dale Brown, Stephen Coonts, etc. And I looked up to the characters, and I realized a lot of them had gone to West Point and/or the Naval Academy, institutions that were usually treated with a hushed reverence. I’d already read a bit about West Point, going through my Grandpa Brennan’s Civil War books, and reading various pocket biographies from various school libraries. But reading Tom Clancy and the authors that he led me to, coupled with a trip to (gasp) the Naval Academy with my Boy Scout troop in 1989 that bordered on a spiritual experience, got me hooked on the notion of a military career. This sort of thing impressed people, and I wanted to see if I measured up.

Then, somewhere in there, I read Ralph Peters’ Red Army. Here was a Trojan horse, a novel that appeared in the same section as the techno-thrillers but didn’t have any American characters, or good guys and bad guys—just people (who happened to be Soviet) going to war against other people. The technical specifications of their weapons were far less important than the vibrancy of their thoughts and feelings and fears. And somewhere in there I stumbled across Stephen Hunter’s Point of Impact, which led me to his earlier books, and some of the best and most nuanced thriller writing out there.

In fairness to Tom Clancy, his characters were getting at least somewhat more complicated. (There was a hint of suspicion in The Cardinal of the Kremlin that Jack Ryan, Clancy’s CIA analyst alter-ego, might be capable of wrongdoing. This turned out to be a red herring, but in the books after that there were at least bad Americans, and some marital difficulties (based entirely on misunderstanding) between Jack Ryan and his wife.)

Still, it became increasingly clear that his heroes were Irish Catholic Americans, and everyone else was basically good or bad based on whether they helped or hindered said heroes. Jack Ryan’s hints of impropriety never hardened into anything approaching real misbehavior, and John Clark (Ryan’s dark, edgy “operator” shadow) and his sidekick “Ding” Chavez, though far more willing to get their hands bloody, were still at least understood to be doing what needed to be done to some pretty bad people. They all seemed to be vehicles for Clancy’s ego gratification, ways for him to do vicariously on paper all the things he didn’t do, but perhaps wanted to, in real life.

The last Clancy book I read cover-to-cover was Debt of Honor. Its climax (a madman piloting a jumbo jet into a national landmark) proved oddly and sadly prescient many years later, but at the time I was just upset at what seemed a transparent deus ex machine to elevate Jack Ryan to the presidency. Clancy and his spawn—the franchise character that could do no wrong—were starting to feel deeply unsatisfying; their flights of quasi-literary fancy somewhat obviously disconnected from real-world behavior. I’d started checking out critical opinion before reading books; I got into Hemingway and Conrad.

And yet I’d also started writing, and some of Tom Clancy’s writing tips actually stuck with me. For the man actually gave some decent advice. “The only difference between fact and fiction is that fiction has to make sense” was one observation I particularly enjoyed. And he had some good book recommendations: Herman Wouk’s The Caine Mutiny appeared on some list of Clancy’s favorite war novels; I devoured it as a high school senior, and it remains a favorite of mine. (Wouk unfortunately started dealing in stock characters himself, with The Winds of War and War and Remembrance.)

Also, my dream of a military career hadn’t died. Somewhere in there, I got in touch with the West Point Admissions Department, and I realized that if I wanted to get in, I’d have to transform myself from a bookish and antisocial high school freshman to an athletic and involved high school junior. Like many of my generation, I became a sad little resume padder, throwing myself into activities I didn’t entirely enjoy because I wanted to impress a lot of people I’d never met, in order to earn a diploma and a commission that would impress still more people. (When Wes Anderson’s Rushmore came out, I identified; I felt like I’d been only marginally less hyper-involved than the comically over-extra-curriculared Max Fischer.) In retrospect, I think I wanted to look so good on paper that nobody would say no to me in the real world—to be a Jack Ryan of sorts, life imitating art. (Or rather, artifice.)

I did a good enough job that West Point took notice. I qualified in every area but physical fitness, and after my first failed Physical Aptitude Exam, I practiced my pullups and my kneeling basketball throws and my standing long jump until I finally qualified. I applied for a nomination through my congressman, Bill McCollum, and when his office called, my family threw a surprise party of sorts to celebrate.

My first thought was: “Oh, fuck, now I actually have to do this.”

June 29th, 1995, my first day as a new cadet, was a blur of yelling and screaming; as far as I could tell, I had the longest hair of any of my incoming classmates, and I remember staring at my reflection that night in the mirror of my second-floor room in Bradley Barracks, seeing a shaved stranger in a gray P.E. shirt and godawful glasses, and wondering: what the hell did I get myself into?

It soon became apparent that I was not a natural military man. I had plenty of classmates who were, who were as high-performing in real life as Jack Ryan and his ilk were on paper, and who were often likeable, funny, and genuinely decent people, to boot. As for me, I just hung in there. To quit would be to admit I’d made a mistake. And that seemed a fate worse than death. I’d staked everything—or my pride, which at least felt like everything—on measuring up, and I was not measuring up.

I also soon realized that West Point was a far more complicated place than I’d realized, or than any techno-thriller writer might have attempted to convey. The granite facades were real; some of the people behind them were equally impressive, but most were far more flawed and complicated and interesting. And I felt like I’d been lied to by a decade-plus of after-school specials and Just-Say-No-To-Drugs PSAs; I’d kept myself on the straight and narrow all through high school to get in there, and plenty of my classmates had been partying, drinking and smoking weed and even maybe experimenting with acid, and we’d all ended up in the same place.

I first got drunk in September of 1995, on a Cadet Catholic Choir field trip to Avalon, New Jersey. Magically, all the fear melted away; for the first time in a long time, I felt like everything was the way it was supposed to be in the world. Every guy was my friend, and every girl was someone I could hook up with. More experienced cadets kept an eye on me and made sure I didn’t overdo it, and I was able to get up and put on my uniform and sing the next morning without embarrassing anyone, even though I was still drunk. I didn’t get drunk again until the Army Navy Game that December. Some yearlings in my company threw a hotel party, and I got obliterated: drinking tumblers of imitation Wild Turkey, seeing in snapshots, puking on my Long Overcoat and on the floor of the Doubletree Hotel in Philadelphia.

Reading-wise, I’d left Tom Clancy behind; the Academy’s English Department didn’t really interest me (too much rote recitation and overanalysis of poems, no real creativity for coursework), so I became a bit of a literary autodidact, reading Faulkner and DeLillo and Joyce in the bathroom before lights-out, or in stolen snippets between coursework. (I was a European History major, and, because West Point hasn’t ever given up on being an engineering school, I took a 5-course Nuclear Engineering track.) And I’d write here and there; I won an English Department prize for prose for two of the four years I was there, and I ended up in a cadet-published literary magazine. Clancy did appear once at the cadet bookstore for a book signing, and I would have swung by, but I had some sort of summer training drill practice that day. My buddy Jubert Chavez did get to swing by the signing table; he said Clancy saw his name tag and asked him if his first name was Ding.

On leave, I was getting as drunk as possible pretty often; once in a blue moon, I’d do so on post as well—I remember one absurdly incomprehensible afternoon of football tailgating, and a house party at a colonel’s place a week before my 21st birthday where I didn’t even remember leaving or going back to the barracks—but very rarely, because people who did that sort of thing too often got kicked out, and I didn’t know who or what I’d be without a West Point class ring, something visible that the world could see to know I was important. I did want to be in the Army; I did want to do well. But the gap between how well I felt I was doing (decent academic grades, middling military and physical ones) and how well my ego wanted me to be doing (Macarthur-like performance) was so great that I was full of fear most of the time. Every once in a while—Christmas dinners with the Corps of Cadets, Taps ceremonies for deceased cadets—I’d remember that I was part of something really big and really cool that was much, much larger than me. But those moments were few and far between. Plenty of cadets got in serious trouble for drinking offenses over the course of my four years at the Academy; how I avoided disciplinary action entirely, I’ll never know. By all rights, I deserved to be kicked out. I thank God I wasn’t; it would have killed me.

What got me wasn’t drinking, but sleeping. I’d been nodding off in almost every class ever since junior year of high school; I did well enough on tests that my grades didn’t suffer, but at West Point it was much harder to skate by. Here and there instructors would throw chalk at me, or I’d get the dreaded admonition “You’re gonna get your whole platoon killed.” (One of those things that sounds over-the-top most of the time, but still nags at you when you know it’s an actual possibility.) I talked to the doctors about it during yearling (sophomore) year but didn’t follow up; I knew if they uncovered anything then they’d just kick me out. But as a firstie (senior), I felt a little more comfortable getting it looked at; I figured with all the money they’d invested in my education, they’d at least have an incentive to fix me up. I was wrong.

I went to Walter Reed in January of 1999 and had a sleep study done. Coincidentally enough, while I was killing time between naps (I had electrodes glued to my skull, and they made me nap at two-hour intervals to see how fast I went into REM sleep), I came across an issue of People magazine about Tom Clancy’s divorce from his first wife, Wanda. There were tidbits about his wife’s generous birthday gifts, and about his drinking and extramarital affairs. I was flabbergasted. And when the sleep study was done, the doctor told me I had narcolepsy and told me I’d probably be medically boarded out of the Army—I apparently could not only nap on demand (like a lot of cadets), but I also almost always went right into REM sleep right away, rather than following a normal sleep cycle, and I also had sleep bouts which were triggered by intense bursts of emotion. Again, I was flabbergasted.

West Point graciously decided to let me graduate without commissioning me. I got a free ride on the taxpayer’s dime and didn’t have to pay it back, which did wonders for my self-loathing. I eventually took the test to become a Foreign Service Officer, but I didn’t pass that, and later, still, I interviewed for an analyst position with the C.I.A.; they thanked me for my application but didn’t take me. (Memories are hazy, but I may have taken their online writing test while hung over, or at least the day after one of my standard weekend nights of blowout drinking, which probably didn’t help.)

It took me a while to do something about the drinking. I won’t get into all the gory details, but among other things, I learned I had to drop my own facades, and keep my insides matching my outsides—to concentrate less on impressing the world and cleaning up the outside, and more on cleaning up the inside, all the resentments and fears that kept me in collision with everyone and kept me getting into the same types of relationships over and over and over again. And I learned about another C.I.A., a nickname for a nebulous but common demographic within the secret societies of people in recovery. There, C.I.A. stands for Catholic Irish Alcoholics.

I did all this to myself, of course. I can’t blame anyone else. Not Tom Clancy (whom I once thought of as a father to my military ambitions), or my own father (whose considerable virtues I often overlooked because he wasn’t any kind of Clancy-esque hero, but rather a devoted and successful executive). There was a gap between how I saw me and how I wanted the world to see me. That gap—between fantasy and reality, or perhaps between fantasy and self-loathing—eventually felt insurmountable. I tried to fill it by ignoring my inner voice, and instead doing things I thought would impress the world. And when that didn’t do, I chose to fill it with alcohol.

I’m basically trying to be the anti-Tom Clancy now—to deal not in flawless stock characters, but in real and interesting ones, ones who actually tell us something about ourselves, rather than just telling us about the author. And publishing-wise, I’m trying to do something completely different. Clancy eventually epitomized the author-as-brand, the writer who could sell not only books, but also movies and miniseries’ and video games, solely because their name was on the cover in big clear letters, and regardless of the fact that they weren’t necessarily the one who created the contents, or the fact that the contents weren’t necessarily good. Whereas I’m aiming to put out memorable books, books that may not sell quickly, but that will be around for a long time. (Or, to put it in musical terms: we can’t all be the Beatles, but I’d rather be the Velvet Underground than the Dave Clark Five.)

Still, I have a lot of sympathy for Tom Clancy these days. When I read the article in People, I’d thought of him as a hypocrite and a blowhard. But when the obituaries started coming out, I read every one I could find, and a lot of other stuff he’d said. “The only way to do all the things you’d like to do is to read,” he said, and I found myself nodding my head. Also, “writing isn’t divinely inspired—it’s hard work.” And particularly this one: “Nothing is as real as a dream. The world can change around you, but your dream will not. Responsibilities need not erase it. Duties need not obscure it. Because the dream is within you, no one can take it away.” I’m sure that, whatever his faults, he was at least a more interesting and complicated person than his characters. I like to think he’d have read and enjoyed my books. And when I get beyond the particulars and look at the overarching similarities, I see in him what I still see in myself—another writer refusing to give up on the dream.

Thoughts on Gravity

It's hard to create a gripping and accurate space drama.

Obviously storytellers have to balance level of detail with narrative flow. And the constraints of space physics make many staples of conventional space movies difficult or impossible. You can’t do many things in space, but it often takes a while to explain why you can’t do them. And most important of all, something new has to happen. When everything goes according to plan, and it starts to seem like it’s all been done before, nobody cares. (Witness the public’s attention span when the real thing was first televised. During Apollo, for the first time in human history, exploration became a shared event while it was happening, and the telecasts of Apollo 8 and Apollo 11 were the most widely-watched ever. But viewership fell off rapidly after that; Apollo 13 became a global story only because it nearly ended in disaster. Which is unfortunate, science-wise. The latter missions were among the most adventurous explorations ever undertaken by man, and great advances for science, but they ended up feeling, to the public, like reruns.)

In short, space drama often seems to require space disaster. (Or, at least, near-disaster.)

Ron Howard’s Apollo 13 got us excited without sacrificing too many facts; it faithfully depicted the fragile technology that took humans a quarter of a million miles away, and largely hewed to the true chronology of the accident and its aftermath. But it probably overplayed the arguments among the crew members, and the friction between them and their ground controllers. And it certainly played up the physical motions, turning a dramatic but slowly-unfolding crisis into a spectacle of speed.

But space is a stately place. Stanley Kubrick understood this, and 2001 took great pains to be realistic, black monoliths and failed AI predictions aside. (In some non-space ways, it was remarkably prescient, as other authors have already pointed out. The astronauts scanning their reading tablets during their meals certainly resemble the zombified specimens one sees staring at phones and Kindles in every public space, yours truly included.) The spacecraft don’t zoom or move quickly, they coast. It takes a long time for things to happen, and the tension comes in part from being so completely enslaved by the laws of physics and orbital mechanics.

Gravity’s a notch below both movies in terms of realism, Still, it owes a lot to the latter, and it’s a cut above most of what passes for a movie these days; as a moviegoer, I’m inclined to praise it just because we need to support directors who can hold a shot for longer than 3 seconds. The camera stares for an uncomfortably long time here, taking us inside the helmet to show us the confusion an astronaut would feel when tumbling through space, then stepping back to show the larger scale of things. We see how mute and impotent human life truly is, how it can only occupy the tiniest speck of that vast black canvas. And in all cases, the camera’s patient—not as sedately minimalist as Kubrick’s, which gave us sequences so slow they were only enjoyable because every frame was as beautiful as a painting, but far less active than was the case in Apollo 13. It trusts us to pay attention.

The screenwriters betray that trust, in the interests of good storytelling. The sequence of events that forms the story’s spine is laughable to anyone with a decent knowledge of orbital mechanics. The Hubble Space Telescope and the International Space Station orbit on different planes—their orbits are inclined at different angles relative to the center of earth. And (partial plot spoiler) a Chinese space station would surely be on a different plane as well. And movement between planes is tremendously difficult. (I read somewhere that moving from an orbit with, say, a 28-degree inclination—typical for something launched from Cape Canaveral—to an orbit around the equator would take as much energy as it takes to go to the moon.)

Does it matter? Most people won’t notice these things, and the movie’s good enough that those who do still end up swept along for the ride, holding tenuously on to our brains as our bodies embark on a viscerally thrilling cinematic ride. And even astronauts were inclined to not care. (Buzz Aldrin, for instance, extravagantly praised the movie. He’s long been calling for humanity to continue its evolution and become multi-planetary; he surely knows it won’t happen soon, but he seems glad that someone’s at least taking the time to imagine exciting things happening in outer space.)

Oddly enough, the movie’s message is the opposite of his. It depicts a chain reaction effect known as the Kessler syndrome, whereby debris from a destroyed satellite could destroy other satellites and cause still more debris. Some theorists (OK, people I read about on Wikipedia) contend that this could essentially close down space, rendering it unsafe for human habitation. Sandra Bullock’s character flees space in the wake of this disaster, choosing to return to earth rather than die in orbit.

And that’s perhaps the movie’s most true-to-life thought, its most accurate sentiment.

Most planners assumed Apollo would be the stepping stone to further exploration, but so far it’s been anything but; no human has gone beyond earth orbit since the crew of Apollo 17 returned to earth more than 40 years ago. For Apollo had unintended consequences, in that it showed us how fragile and unique our home is; as Gene Cernan said, “We went to explore the moon, but, in fact, we discovered the earth.” And the movie ends, perhaps, with us taking that one last ego-defeating step back home from space. Bullock’s character survives a perilous re-entry and accidental splashdown in a lake. She crawls ashore like she’s retracing eons of animal and human evolution—swim, crawl, walk. But more importantly, she does it with gratitude, rather than longing for more; she savors the feel of earth between her toes and fingers while above her, the last of humanity’s space outposts re-enter the atmosphere in a fiery blaze, a funeral pyre for our orbital dreams. So Gravity’s message, then, is the same as Apollo’s was. There may be billions of worlds out there, but we have no way of getting to one that has the ability to sustain us. It’s a harsh message, but in that sense, it makes the movie realistic; it’s the same message, in fact, as The Wizard of Oz. We’re already where we’re supposed to be. We have to make the most of it. There’s no place like home.

(Gerald Brennan is the author of the recently-released and even-more-realistic space drama Zero Phase. Despite everything printed in this article, he’d still go into space in a heartbeat, if given the chance.)

The Last Good Halloween

Our newest is up for sale here! And if you're in Chicago, you can come to the launch party on Saturday, November 9th from 7-9 pm at Uncharted Books, 2630 N. Milwaukee Ave. Hope to see you there!

Bad Meets Evil

xxx--SPOILER ALERT: IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN HEAT OR THE FINAL EPISODE OF BREAKING BAD, STOP READING AND GO WATCH THEM--xxx

Breaking Bad is one of the most compelling works I’ve come across in some time, in any medium. It creates a world that feels nearly as compelling and interesting as the real one, and it leaves me thinking about that world after I’ve left it. On those terms, the most important to me as an author, it’s a smashing success. (I’m reading two well-regarded books right nowThe Growth of the Soil by Knut Hamsun, and The Mote in God’s Eye by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournellebut I totally ignored both during my morning CTA commute so I could read the procession of reviews of the series finale, “Felina.” So I’d rather read about Breaking Bad than experience something else firsthand.)

But I feel like the show pulled its punches in the final episode.

I don’t know if art needs to teach a moral lesson, or if it should have any goals other than its own excellence. Even the Vatican (not the ultimate arbiter on such matters, though it pretends to be) judges movies on their artistic merits, rather than on how closely they hew to the party line; their list of the best movies wouldn’t be out of line for most secular critics, featuring a lot of true classics like The Bicycle Thief and Citizen Kane and ignoring religious drivel like Jesus of Nazareth. But Breaking Bad clearly set itself up as a morality play; its very title contains a judgment. And it seemed on track to deliver a solid art-meets-morality message in the Treasure of the Sierra Madre vein, right up until the very end.

Its moral dynamic reminds me of Heat, another flawed-but-favorite work. (Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely love Heat. If I can create something that gets anyone else thinking and talking about it as much as I think and talk about either Heat or Breaking Bad, I’ll consider myself a massive success. I hope I’ve done so with Resistance, but obviously that’s not for me to judge. l digress.) Heat clearly suggests more similarities than differences between the good guy (Al Pacino’s Vincent Hanna) and the bad guy (Robert DeNiro’s Neil McCauley). On one level, it isn’t even a crime movie, but a film about work, about how both characters’ relentless focus on on-the-job perfection destroys their personal lives, leaving them with no solace but to dig themselves deeper into their work. And yet it is obviously a crime movie, one that can only put the good guy and the bad guy on a similar moral level by contrasting the bad guy with someone who’s truly evil, a repulsive character named Waingro with a swastika tattoo and no redeeming moral qualities whatsoever. He murders innocents during a robbery; he kills hookers; unlike DeNiro’s character, Waingro never indicates even a remote awareness of anything resembling “good.”

Unlike Heat, Breaking Bad doesn’t go to any great lengths to put Walter White on a similar plane as his law enforcement nemesis. His relationship with brother-in-law DEA agent Hank Schraeder’s very unlike DeNiro’s with Pacino—they’re not strangers drawn together by respect for one another’s smarts and professionalism, but family members who end up repulsed by the moral chasm between them. And to Breaking Bad’s credit, it shows a substantial decay in Walt’s moral character over the show’s course, which sets him starkly at odds with DeNiro’s relatively unchanging Neil McCauley—the Platonic ideal of the master thief, cunning and talented and willful, but with his own moral code. He doesn’t compromise himself when Waingro (a new member of his robbery crew) unnecessarily guns down an armored truck crewman in the movies opening heist; he plans to kill Waingro and only fails at that juncture due to some bad timing. (He breaks his own rules near the end, killing Waingro when he knows he should just walk away, but it’s more a professional slip than an ethical one, and he’s essentially the same man at the end that he is at the beginning.)

At the end of Breaking Bad's “Dead Freight” episode, in a scene with echoes of Heat’s heist, Walter White watches a young Neo-Nazi affiliated crewmember named Todd gun down an innocent child. And yet Walt doesn’t kill his Waingro—he integrates him more fully into his criminal operation, perhaps knowing that someone more morally compromised than Jesse will be even more reliable in a criminal enterprise, less liable to turn snitch than anyone else in the operation. For me, this was one of the best parts about Breaking Bad—it went beyond its influences to show us something truly new. And it I let out a gasp when it was clear Todd was Walt’s new partner in crime.

A few episodes on, Walt recruits Todd’s uncle to arrange the murder of several informants. Like so many of the bad interactions in this show, this proves to be an unreliable and unstable bit of personal chemistry; a few episodes on, Uncle Jack ends up taking most of Walt’s money and killing brother-in-law Hank despite Walt’s pleas. Breaking Bad had as many high points as the Himalayas, and this episode, “Ozymandias,” was perhaps its Everest. (I don’t know that I’ve ever been quite so breathless, so physically and mentally exhausted, after a television episode.) Its end saw Walt exiled and alienated from his family, the very people he’d ostensibly turned to crime to help. The ending felt both tragic and inevitable and unforgettable; had the series ended here (or shortly afterwards, with Walt dying in exile in New Hampshire), I’d have had no complaints. (Or fewer complaints, at least—it did nag me that the caper at the end of the great “Live Free or Die” episode didn’t lead to too many long-term consequences for Walt et. al. They destroyed a police evidence room with a giant magnet, and while they ostensibly didn’t leave behind any fingerprints, THEY LEFT THE MAGNET! I’m sure most police departments would move heaven and earth to find the perpetrators of such a brazen crime, and even if the Albuquerque P.D. was particularly lazy, a cursory Googling of salvage companies and/or scrapyards might have provided them with a handy list of PEOPLE WHO OWNED GIANT MAGNETS. I digress.)

Again, Walt exiled and/or dying might have been perfect. But alas, the show’s creators opened with a flash forward showing Walt emerging from exile to buy an M-60 machine gun. And that was a loose end they obviously needed to tie securely. (Also, according to one of Chekov’s famous maxims, if you introduce a gun in Act One, you have to use the gun by Act Three.) Vince Gilligan admitted in an interview that they’d written that scene not knowing why Walt was buying the gun, or on whom he needed to use it. They'd contemplated having Walt use it against someone in law enforcement—perhaps in an attempt to break Jesse out of jail. But in the end, Walt ends up gunning down a room full of neo-Nazis, perhaps the only people in the Breaking Bad universe less honorable than him. Walt has met a second Waingro in the form of Uncle Jack, and he dispatches this one in much the same way that DeNiro dealt with the original—with pistol shots to the head and chest.

Given Vince Gilligan’s stated desire in Breaking Bad to see a character go from Mr. Chips to Scarface, to turn the character from protagonist to antagonist, it’s a shame. Walt worked with evil, and shook hands with evil, but at the end of the day he’s gunning evil down with a remote-controlled M-60, or standing at arm’s length and filling it with 9mm holes, creating a tiny bit of wiggle room between himself and evil, whereas perhaps none really existed. (There’s a great Bukowski quote: “Find what you love and let it kill you.” Both Walter White and Neil McCauley might well have followed this advice, and both could have had the same eulogy: “He may have hurt the people he most loved, but he worked hard and was the best at what he did. And, hey, at least he wasn’t a Nazi.”) So Breaking Bad ends with a cathartic Taxi Driver-style bit of redemption through violence, something that probably works out a lot more reliably in the movies than it does in real life. (There are other echoes of Taxi Driver too, in Walt’s use of gadgetry, and in the final shots looking directly down on him as the police arrive.) Unlike the unsettling violence elsewhere in the show, this bloodbath leaves us comforted, for Todd and Uncle Jack have been portrayed without any humanity. They’re reduced to a symbol, a swastika, and it becomes easy to see them as less than human and therefore deserving of death. But even the worst villains in real life have some touch of humanity--Charles Manson wrote music, John Wayne Gacy painted clowns, and Hitler was great with animals. (All this isn't meant to imply that evil doesn't exist, or that there's some moral equivalency between good and evil. Rather, the unsettling thing, the thing Breaking Bad came close to showing but shied away from, is that there is no clear comfortable demarcation line with evil people on one side and the rest of us on the other. Even the executioners in the Holocaust were, in the words of Christopher Browning's devastating must-read on the subject, ordinary men.) Whatever Walt's flawed motives—revenge for the theft of most of his money, rather than justice for Jesse—we're still rooting for him in the end. And so Breaking Bad ends up indulging in a bit of the same moral relativism as its protagonist.

Perhaps some level of imperfection is necessary in a work this great, like in Japanese paintings where it’s OK for brushstrokes to be visible because flaws are part of the aesthetic. Treasure of the Sierra Madre was perfect, but I’ve never felt the need to watch it again. As for Heat, when I first saw it, I was annoyed by a scene where Pacino finds out that his stepdaughter has attempted suicide in his hotel room. I felt like there was no explanation as to how she’d gotten there—but eventually I just accepted it, for it helped lead to some of the great dramatic moments in the movie. And there are several scenes in the final episode of Breaking Bad that I wouldn’t have wanted to miss—Walt admitting to his wife that he’d done it all for himself, Jesse finally refusing Walt, Walt wandering into the meth lab and leaving bloody fingerprints on a gleaming silvery vessel. That may be a great metaphor for the show as a whole—we can get pretty close to perfection, but we usually mess it up. But in the end, the flaws are necessary, for they send us back for more viewings, to see if we missed anything; they’re what makes the experience human, and memorable.

Ninety-Seven to Three

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Elizabeth S. Tieri
773-616-0913
getbacktoprint@gmail.com

 marketing@tortoisebooks.com  

Ninety-Seven to Three by G.D. Brennan III

 BATTLE RAPS TO CLASSIC ROCK GRANDPOPS – A REVOLUTIONARY POETRY COLLECTION              

A series of battle rap responses to classic rock songs, Ninety-Seven to Three takes aim at the unquestioned mantras of modern life—the music we all know by heart, by artists like the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Journey, AC/DC and Santana. Published by indie imprint Tortoise Books, in conjunction with Back to Print, this collection—alternately funny and thought-provoking—looks at love and desire, ambition and artistry, work and play, and the author’s own journey from chip-on-the-shoulder single guy to loving husband and father.

“The title comes from an anecdote in Keith Richards’ autobiography,” Brennan explains. “When they were working on Exile on Main Street, they had some heroin that was supposedly so potent it needed to be cut at a ratio of ninety-seven parts cut to three parts smack. He thought about writing a song about this ratio, but he never got around to it. So I wrote a poem about it, a poem that ultimately didn’t get into this collection, but that helped inspire it. And I like the implications behind the title—the quixotic battle against impossible odds, which is what we’re trying to do by publishing this independently.”          

Still, this collection’s far more than an experiment in publishing—it’s a bold selection of battle verse, equal parts T.S. Eliot and Eminem, a double-barreled shotgun blast at the sacred cash cows of the music industry. Poems include:

  • A lyrical dismemberment of Bruce Springsteen’s “Blinded by the Light”
  • A lively riff on Journey’s “Don’t Stop Believing” and its relevance (or irrelevance) to debt-riddled Americans struggling through the Great Recession.
  • Musings on “All You Need Is Love” and its frequent misinterpretations.
  • A reflection on AC/DC’s “Let Me Put My Love Into You” from a data analyst working in Microsoft SQL Server.

“Most poetry collections are far too long,” Brennan explains. “They’re built around the economics of the traditional publishing industry, where you have to put out a longer book to make it worthwhile to do an offset printing run, and to make the publicity efforts cost-effective. And that works well for novels, but other forms fall by the wayside—novellas, short stories, and poetry collections. Publishers obviously bundle these together for the sake of economics, but they risk losing the coherence and plot arc that pull you through a novel. Here we’re doing something different, something that wouldn’t be possible in the old publishing world. It’s a short, punchy collection of ten poems, with a solid thematic arc, where the reader won’t get bogged down in the middle and will end up wanting more rather than wanting less—a concept album of poems.”

Full track listing is as follows:

01 – I Need You

02 – Blinded By The Light

03 – Don’t Stop Believing

04 – Time

05 – Rust Never Sleeps

06 – (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction

07 – Let Me Put My Love Into You

08 – Like A Rolling Stone

09 – Black Magic Woman

10 – All You Need Is Love

 

Jerry Brennan graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point and earned a Master's at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. He’s the author of Resistance, which Kirkus Reviews called an “extremely impressive debut.” His writing has appeared in the Chicago Tribune, The Good Men Project and Innerview Magazine; he has also been a frequent contributor and co-editor at Back to Print and the deadline. He resides in Chicago.

Website: www.TortoiseBooks.com

Ninety-Seven to Three will be launched on 3/1/13. It will be available for purchase at Amazon.com through Tortoise Books for $.49 in Kindle format, or $4.99 if you like killing trees. A deluxe version assembled by Back to Print will be available at select independent bookstores in Chicago.

REVIEW COPIES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST

Promoting the Tortoise (A.K.A. Find a Typo - $50)

So it turns out publicists cost money—not an ungodly amount, but you do need a bank balance with a comma in it. And we’re not there right now. Granted, we were there, but we splurged with our budget for Resistance, buying half-page newspaper ads instead of spending at a more tortoise-like pace so as to actually, you know, sustain some publicity. So we basically shot our load when it comes to promotion and advertising dollars. We’re the three-pump chumps of the book business. Lesson learned for next time.

The good news is there’s still social media and word-of-mouth. We’ve been tweeting and throwing up a couple mentions on facebook every week, and the book’s still selling. Not enough to put commas in our bank account just yet, mind you, but it still has legs—short, stubby, tortoise legs. And we got a review on Amazon from a random stranger who compared us very favorably to our main competition—another novel on the Heydrich assassination, one that’s received the level of critical attention we’d like to eventually get for our books.

We want that level of attention. And we want commas in our bank account. Hopefully not just for ego-feeding purposes, but because this is a great book that people will be glad they purchased. So to get people talking (and hopefully buying), we’re launching a promotion: Find a Typo - $50

Obviously there’s far more to a great book than a lack of typos. (Or tyops, as we like to call them.) And we do think this is a great book, worthy of your money and your time—not just free from mistakes, but actively good, a great and memorable read. It’s a book we published because we wanted it on our own bookshelves. But to handle the big things, you have to prove you can handle the small things, too. Popular perception would have you believe that independently-published books are poorly written and riddled with tyops, and we’d like indie publishing to be as hip and respected and professional as indie rock—not a refuge for people who can’t get a deal with a major company, but an exciting and vibrant corner of the industry, an incubator for talented people putting out professional products.

Here are the ground rules for the promotion:

1) You must have purchased the Kindle or physical version of the book from Amazon after the start of this promotion.

2) You must be the first person to discover and report the typo.

3) The typo MUST be unintentional—something the author would have changed had they noticed it in time. This excludes the following types of intentional spelling and usage choices that would otherwise appear to be typos:

  • Words that were spelled using American English in the first third of the book and in British English in the remainder.
  • Names that were deliberately spelled differently in the last third of the book because the last narrator wanted to avoid using Czech letters—Čurda vs. Churda, for instance.
  • Place names that are spelled in the Czech form in the first two thirds of the book and in the     German form in the last part—Lidice and Liditz, for example.
  • Names that are spelled differently by different credible sources, such as Josef Gabčik’s first name, which is spelled with an “s” in the Czech Ministry of Defense’s English-language account of Operation Anthropoid but appears as “Jozef” in some other sources.
  • Deliberate spelling changes used to convey drunkenness in dialogue.

4) Multiple misspellings of a proper noun—place name, character name, etc.—shall count as one typo.

5) Typos must be reported with an email to marketing@tortoisebooks.com containing a copy of your purchase confirmation email from Amazon and a description of the typo.

6) Payments for this promotion will be made via PayPal.

7) Tortoise Books has the right to discontinue this promotion in the unlikely event that payouts reach $500, or in two months, whichever comes first.

Sound good? Pick up a copy and give it a whirl. We’re sure we’re putting out a solid product, as good as (or better than) anything coming out of a major publishing house. We’re sure it’s in the best shape possible—and if we’re wrong, we'll pay you to tell us about it.

Selling the Tortoise

Apologies to the five or so of you who have been following this journal--we’ve been busy for the last month. We’re always busy, come to think of it, but we’ve been super extra busy getting ready for Chicago’s 2012 Printers Row Lit Fest, where we launched Resistance.

There were a kajillion little things to get done beforehand, and many of those things were dependent on other things; to launch the book, we had to print the book; to print the book, we had to get historical photos from ČTK in Prague; to get the historical photos, we had to raise funds on Kickstarter.

It seemed like a dicey proposition for a while; the fundraising started off slow, so we had to do a little more groveling than expected, and we also had to activate our emergency funding plan, which consisted of liquidating some non-liquid assets. (Think Dan Aykroyd selling his watch to the seedy pawnbroker in Trading Places. OK, it was a notch above that. But only a notch.) BUT we also had some larger-than-expected donations from both friends and random strangers--generous gifts which help push us comfortably over our fundraising goals with a whole day to spare.

After that, of course, we still had plenty to worry about; we found ourselves checking the bank account quasi-religiously for the next few days, waiting for Amazon to actually release our funds, of which they and Kickstarter had taken roughly a 10% cut. And of course, getting the money wasn’t the end of our worries--we had to wire the money to Prague to pay for the pictures. And getting the pictures wasn’t the end of our problems--we had to get them into the manuscript and convert it into a .pdf in a way that it would look like we were professionals who had just paid $1600 for the reprint rights, not rank amateurs in the field of graphic design, building our book cover in Microsoft Paint. And getting it printed wasn’t the end of our worries, nor was buying the advertising, nor was sorting out various seemingly insurmountable Kindle formatting issues, nor was coming home last Monday to find that FedEx had finally delivered our book. (We gotta admit, this part did dial the worry-ometer back quite a bit.)

ANYWAY, the book fair weekend arrived, and the sun was blazing hot, but we kept slathering on the sunblock and somehow escaped burn-free. And we caught a couple printing issues in our final editions (loose pages on three softcovers, and a section inverted on one hardcover) but by and large, the books looked great, and we found more than a few customers, including several who were complete strangers who’d happened across our advertising. We actually sold all of our serviceable softcovers, and put a huge dent in our hardcovers.

Of course, there's still stuff to worry about--the book's out there in the hands of the reading public. Unlike other artists, writers and publishers don’t get to directly observe their audience’s reaction to their work. Musicians can gauge whether a crowd is excited or bored; directors can sit in on advance screenings of a movie and judge the audience’s response; artists can go to their gallery openings and observe the chatter. But if you try watching someone while they read your book, you look pretty damn creepy. So we might as well not worry; we should just trust that it's out there and we'll get the attention we'll deserve.

Then again, maybe we should just hire a publicist.

Publicizing the Tortoise

There's a great scene in Lawrence of Arabia where Lawrence and Sherif Ali have entered the Ottoman city of Deraa on their own, foolishly trying to attract supporters for their Arab revolt in the midst of a Turkish stronghold.

"What are you looking for?" Sherif Ali asks.

Lawrence responds (with more than a little grandiosity): "Some way to announce myself."

To which Sherif Ali says: "Please be patient with him, God."

That's about how we feel when it comes to promotion. When you've put a lot of work into something, you want to let people know about it, but it's hard to do without sounding like an ass. And people pay a lot more attention to what other people say about you than to what you say about you, anyway. Fortunately, everyone's a critic these days, and so there are reviewers a-plenty trolling the interwebs; unfortunately, it's hard to get their attention, especially for something like a book that can't be consumed in a single sitting.

Fortunately, Kirkus Reviews has an Indie arm where you can get projects reviewed. We took a gamble on doing this with Resistance; we wanted to have something blurb-worthy on the back cover for launch, because, hey, no one wants to buy a book unless someone else thinks it's worth buying. Given our production schedule, we were a little worried about what might happen if they didn't like it--but it looks like we'll be fine. Here's the full text of their review:

Brennan’s three intertwined novellas revolve around the Nazi occupation of Prague and the assassination of Reichsprotektor Reinhard Heydrich in 1942. The first section of Brennan’s accomplished and readable novel is a lightly fictionalized “autobiography” of Czechoslovakian Gen. František Moravec. After experience on the Eastern Front during World War I, then time as a Russian prisoner of war and as one of the heads of the Czech resistance in exile, Moravec was one of the chief architects behind Operation Anthropoid, the plot to assassinate Heydrich, the brutal Czech proconsul. The second section is a minute-by-minute documentation of the operation, told through a collection of reports and memoranda. The final section is the almost stream-of-consciousness diary of Czech collaborator Karel as he sits in jail awaiting his execution. “The key to controlling the present is controlling the past ... And the best way to control the past is to tell a story about it,” says one resident of occupied Czechoslovakia, and this is certainly the case in Brennan’s triptych. Three very different prisms are implemented to bring Operation Anthropoid—and the larger experience of Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia—alive for readers. The central events of the story—the plot to kill Heydrich, the assassination itself and the staggering reprisals taken by the Nazis—are approached from several different angles, heightening both the tension and the power of the narratives. Brennan’s command of facts is absolute and his ear for dialogue is pitch-perfect. The author is unafraid of making readers spend a great deal of time with some very unsavory people; Karel is particularly repellent yet mesmerizing. 

An extremely impressive debut.

So that's exciting! Definitely blurbable. And it's always nice to put a complicated and intricately-plotted work in the hands of an anonymous stranger and see that they actually get it. After all, without making connections, the whole writing and publishing thing gets kinda lonely.

Of course, we're still looking for more blurbs. So drop us a line at editors@tortoisebooks.com if you'd like a review copy!

Funding the Tortoise

We recently popped in to a conference at the Chicago Cultural Center for advice on building and developing a web presence. They mentioned NOT putting up a website in Flash, because it’s hard to maintain; we promptly didn’t convert our website to Flash. They mentioned putting up biographic information, so as to make it easier for any interested journalists to learn a little about us; we did that relatively promptly. They mentioned blogging regularly to keep the website updated and fresh and sticky; we promptly got too busy getting Resistance ready for launch to maintain our hoped-for blog-post-a-week schedule.

Also, we had to launch a Kickstarter campaign, and we were busy crunching the numbers for that and filming our project video. Now, asking for money isn’t our strong suit. But our first funding plan—the Mega Millions—fell through, and we didn’t want to go too far out of pocket on this thingy, because we’ve already spent a good amount of money getting it out there—advance copies, photo rights, etc. (Granted, it is our flagship project, the Reasonable Doubt to our Rock-A-Fella Records, the Chronic to our Death Row, so we will go way out of pocket if we have to—but we don’t want to have to. And we don't want to threaten to throw Vanilla Ice off a hotel balcony to get funding. Granted, we're not morally opposed to it, but he probably doesn't have the money.) So we’re looking for backers on Kickstarter. Check us out if you’re so inclined. The deadline’s a little tight—somewhat un-tortoise-y—but we want to be able to have as much time in post-production as possible, giving you a book that is worth your hard-earned money. So fund us! You’ll be glad you did.

Branding the Tortoise

We're writers. We're not used to the whole "branding" thing. But we are trying to create a brand here, so it's something we gotta work on, slow and steady.

We're hoping to have a table at the Printers Row Lit Fest, to sell books and connect with new authors and what-not. (We put in our application this week, a couple days ahead of their deadline. We emailed it AND, because tortoises are cautious, we sent a redundant copy via FedEx Overnight with the Next Business Morning delivery option. It felt very un-Tortoise.) ANYWAY, since we'll be selling books, we want a brand for those books, and since we want a brand, we figured we'd better get a logo.

We first needed something as a placeholder for our Twitter account, because we didn't want just the standard blank photo icon, although since Twitter uses an egg, it's oddly apropos. (No one knows which comes first between the chicken or the egg, but when it comes down to the tortoise and the egg, it's clearly the latter, at least as far as they're concerned.) ANYWAY, we combed the interwebs and didn't like most of the pictures, but this proved a worthy logo for the first week:

We wanted something a little more...lively, though.

We mentioned this to our journalist friend Amy Hayden, recently of TimeOut Chicago, while hanging out at Chicago Zine Fest with our friends Elizabeth Tieri and Rob Chambers from Back To Print and The Deadline. (We're involved with those publications as well, so we were helping man the table, while also passing out postcards with a picture of a dead Nazi on them to promote our first book, Resistance. On a side note, just as an FYI, pictures of dead Nazis kinda creep people out, and when your head's shaved, it adds to the general level of creepiness.) ANYWAY, my friend's son--the talented and personable Basil--promptly offered to design a logo for us. Here's what he came up with:

His picture, while not without a certain charm, isn't quite the image we're hoping to project, although we are keeping it on file in the even we start a kids label.

Fortunately, we were also able to enlist the even-more-considerable talents of our good friend Rachele O'Hare, who drew a design that somehow combined the black-and-white seriousness of Tortoise #1 with the whimsy of Tortoise #2. While it still needs a couple slight tweaks, we were excited enough that we showed it off to a good many friends, and we got so excited we had to listen to mellow indie rock and mellow Euro-techno (Lambchop's OH (ohio) and The Notwist's Neon Golden, respectively) to slow us down to our normal tortoise pace. And we still had a hard time sleeping!

Anyway, without further ado, here's what she came up with:

Not bad!